Just a quick link to a collection of “standards” for determining whether your online courses are of sufficient quality or not. I wonder how my open courses would rate…
You’re currently reading “Quality and Online Learning,” an entry on iterating toward openness
October 28th, 2008As a former Aggie, I’m surprised you didn’t list the Merrill 5 star rating. Three great collections though – thanks for sharing.
October 28th, 2008Thanks for posting these. I’m familiar with QM and Monterey Institute’s but not NACOL.
The timing of your post has synchronicity for me; at UVU we have our own rubric that aims at measuring some aspects of quality and values heavily faculty-authored content, and John K. and I were just talking about revamping it this week. We had a conference call with Jean Runyon of QM today which left me reinvigorated to the ideal of developing useful and effective standards for evaluating quality e-learning.
October 28th, 2008Re. Darren’s comment: Merrill’s 5 Star Instruction web site.
November 1st, 2008Don’t forget the Sloan-C 5 Pillars:
XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
This blog about openness, open education, and open content is maintained by David Wiley. You can learn more about David by reading the brief biography on davidwiley.org.
4 Comments
Jump to comment form | comments rss | trackback uri