Quality and Online Learning

Published
by
david
on October 28, 2008
in open content
. Tags: .

Just a quick link to a collection of “standards” for determining whether your online courses are of sufficient quality or not. I wonder how my open courses would rate…

4 Responses to “Quality and Online Learning”

Feed for this Entry Trackback Address
  1. 1 Darren Draper
    October 28, 2008 at 5:40 pm

    As a former Aggie, I’m surprised you didn’t list the Merrill 5 star rating. Three great collections though - thanks for sharing.

  2. 2 Jared Stein
    October 28, 2008 at 5:50 pm

    Thanks for posting these. I’m familiar with QM and Monterey Institute’s but not NACOL.

    The timing of your post has synchronicity for me; at UVU we have our own rubric that aims at measuring some aspects of quality and values heavily faculty-authored content, and John K. and I were just talking about revamping it this week. We had a conference call with Jean Runyon of QM today which left me reinvigorated to the ideal of developing useful and effective standards for evaluating quality e-learning.

  3. 3 Jared Stein
    October 28, 2008 at 5:57 pm

    Re. Darren’s comment: Merrill’s 5 Star Instruction web site.

  4. 4 Jon Mott
    November 1, 2008 at 7:40 am

    Don’t forget the Sloan-C 5 Pillars:

    http://www.sloan-c.org/5pillars

Leave a Reply