Comments on OER-Enabled Pedagogy eclectic, pragmatic, enthusiastic2017-05-03T16:23:00Zhttps://opencontent.org/blog/archives/5009/feed/atom
By: catherinecronin catherinecroninhttp://catherinecronin.nethttps://opencontent.org/?p=5009#comment-514122017-05-03T16:23:00Z2017-05-03T16:23:00ZHi David… thank you for sharing the fruit of your deep thinking and conversations about this concept. This is a crystal-clear definition. The recurring theme in the history of open education is surely the multiple interpretations of openness — and thus the lack of agreement about definitions, from open education itself to open pedagogy, learning objects, MOOCs, and so on. Debate is good, and often leads to useful advancements in our work; it can also be frustrating. I think this debate has been an example of that. In my research on OEP, I can refer to OER and OER-enabled pedagogy as clearly defined concepts. And I’ll continue to write about open pedagogy and OEP as widely-used concepts, each with a range of interpretations in practice. I accept that we will never have a completely ‘clean’ set of word-tools; multiple interpretations of concepts exist and exploring emergent practices is important. Our collective wisdom (via research, practice, reflection, discussion), from many different standpoints and approaches, will help us to move forward in this field. Thanks, as always, for sharing your work and your thinking.
]]>
By: MBali MBalihttps://opencontent.org/?p=5009#comment-514112017-05-02T23:24:00Z2017-05-02T23:24:00ZI like this a lot. This makes a lot of sense as defining OER-enabled pedagogy as a subset of open pedagogy. That is, I think, what many of us always believed. We just didn’t have a name for it, and now we do đŸ™‚ Great name choice!
]]>