<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>iterating toward openness &#187; publishers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/tag/publishers/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://opencontent.org/blog</link>
	<description>pragmatism over zeal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 22:44:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Upgrading Elsevier</title>
		<link>http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/468</link>
		<comments>http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/468#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:36:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[open content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ocw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/468</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you believe, like many, that academic publishers like Elsevier are evil, you may want to upgrade your opinion of Elsevier itself to &#8220;small but definitely non-zero chance that this organization is not evil.&#8221; According to a joint release from &#8230; <a href="http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/468">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you believe, like many, that academic publishers like Elsevier are evil, you may want to upgrade your opinion of Elsevier itself to &#8220;small but definitely non-zero chance that this organization is not evil.&#8221;  According to a <a href="http://ocw.mit.edu/OcwWeb/web/about/media/elsevier_announce/elsevier_announce.htm">joint release from MIT and Elsevier</a>: </p>
<blockquote><p>In a move to encourage open education, MIT OpenCourseWare (OCW) and Elsevier have agreed to make available figures and text selections from any of Elsevier&#8217;s more than 2,000 journal titles for use on OCW. As a result of this landmark agreement, select Elsevier content can now be included within the open access OCW course materials &#8211; to be freely downloaded, used and shared under a Creative Commons license.</p></blockquote>
<p>And while you would expect Elsevier to choose CC By-NC-ND as the license under which they distribute materials, I am impressed to say that they have have instead chosen CC By-NC-SA. (Insert NC rant here if you feel it absolutely necessary. I&#8217;ll wait. Finished?) In theory, the deal is only for MIT OCW right now, but once any of that material is licensed CC By-NC-SA, that horse is permanently out of the barn. </p>
<p>We&#8217;ll see where this goes; but wherever it goes, good for Elsevier. I can&#8217;t believe I just typed those words&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/468/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

