Monthly Archive for April, 2009

Editorial Response

The Deseret News has provided an editorial response to the interview with me they published earlier this week. The editorial is titled Universities will be relevant.

The things about the response that make me giggle are: (1) the newspaper felt a need to write a response to a piece written by one of its own reporters, and (2) the editorial largely agrees with my assessment of the future risk to higher education. In fact, as far as I can tell, the only disagreement the Deseret News has with the earlier article is an argument with the headline of the story – in which I was quoted very much out of context, as I explained yesterday.

Life goes on…

Universities will be ‘irrelevant’ by 2020

RT @zephoria: Most people who seek mass attention are unaware of the costs of being famous. Few know what they’re getting into. Coping w/ fame ain’t easy.

If the Chronicle’s headline When Professors Print Their Own Diplomas, Who Needs Universities didn’t catch my colleagues’ attention, today’s front page story in the Deseret News seems to have done the trick: Universities will be ‘irrelevant’ by 2020, Y. professor says. By 8:30 am today (the day the article was published) I’d already received multiple emails and a phone call.

Now, I did actually say something like this – but it was preceded by “If universities can’t find the will to innovate and adapt to changes in the world around them (what’s happening in the economy, affordability, the impacts of technology and openness, etc.)… universities will be irrelevant by 2020.”

(It reminds me of my very first newspaper interview ever. I was an undergrad. I was singing Nanki-Poo in the Mikado at Marshall University, and the local paper came to talk to us about the production. I had just recently returned from serving an LDS mission in Japan, and had a number of things to say to the reporter about the culture, setting, etc. of the show. The quote attributed to me in the paper the next day read something like, “The Mikado really demonstrates how women don’t fit into society.” I was devastated.)

I hope this most recent article in the DesNews catalyzes some useful conversations and does more good than harm…

Online version of the OER Remix Game (beta)

I recently posted a link to the OER Remix Game, a card game you can play with friends to learn about the license compatibility difficulties involved in remixing. Well, if you’ve had a hard time convincing your friends to play the game with you, you can now try a beta of the online (one player) version of the game! You can find it at
OER Remix Game Online.

Your thoughts and feedback would be appreciated. Critical and corrective feedback is, of course, the most useful kind.

The Trucker Tale

I love to create stories to teach otherwise difficult to understand concepts. The Polo Parable has proven to be an effective way to help people see the madness involved in trying to “move” classroom teaching practices online and help them understand that different contexts call for different strategies. In the spirit of the Polo Parable, here is the “Trucker Tale.”

Once upon a time there was an inventor. She was brilliant. All through the night and all during the day she dreamed, she schemed, she thought, she imagined. Then one day she had a “Eureka!” moment. She sketched out the design of her breakthrough product, and worked and reworked the design by showing it to friends and getting their feedback.

When she was satisfied that the design was ready to take to production, she began contacting venture capital organizations and banks. It was a long, painful process, but finally she acquired the funding she needed to put her ideas to work.

Flickr:PhillipC

Flickr:PhillipC

Money in hand she began searching for employees – production specialists, designers, marketing experts, and others. Finding the right people for the enterprise was almost as difficult as finding the money to start the enterprise, but at last she succeeded in finding and hiring the right people for the job.

They all set to work. It was alternately glorious and tedious, fulfilling and demoralizing. There were false starts and breakthroughs; there was tension and laughter; there were tears of frustration and tears of joy. They persevered through it all, and at length the day arrived when they had a product ready to ship!

Relieved, the inventor began contacting shipping companies. But she could not believe what she heard. The truckers would deliver her goods, but only subject to the most unbelievable conditions:

  • the inventor had to agree to ship her product via the one trucking company exclusively,
  • this exclusive shipping deal had to be a perpetual deal, never subject to review or cancelation, and
  • the truckers would be the ones who would sell her product to the public and the truckers would keep all the profits.

Every shipping company she contacted gave the same response. Dejected, but unwilling to see the fruits of all her labor go to waste, she eventually relented and signed a contract with one of the companies.

This is, of course, actually a story about a researcher and her interactions with the journal publishing industry. Why do more faculty not see that, as researchers, we come up with ideas for research, find grant funding for the research, identify and hire graduate students and other professionals to perform the research with us, carry out the research, write up the results of the research in a clear and concise manner, and then are forced to surrender all our rights in the written results of our research to a publisher who sells them for his own profit? Unfortunately, this lunacy is the water in which all academic fish swim, making it difficult to recognize. The purpose of the Trucker Tale is to help people see the insanity in academic publishing.

OER Interview with Sunnie Kim (audio)

Sunnie links to the audio of our recent interview about open education, some of my current projects, and some unsolicited dissertation advice.