Monthly Archive for February, 2009

USU OCW Receives Some Attention at Home

John said that a prophet hath no honour in his own country.

While USU OCW has earned international attention in some of the world’s greatest media outlets, it has only just this week hit USU’s own news service, as they recognize in the story OCW Receiving National, International Recognition. It’s great to see the institution paying some attention to this wonderful program.

While the administration may not know it, according to Google USU OCW is the 4th most useful / important / interesting thing happening at USU, only ranking behind the university home page, the athletics page, and the extension page. No USU college or department outranks USU OCW in the eyes of Google. Therefore no USU college or department outranks OCW in the eyes of millions of individuals around the world who depend on Google to help it understand what is useful, interesting, and important.

In a time when huge financial pressures are squeezing every university’s budget, here’s hoping that USU will recognize the long-term value of USU OCW.

Yes, That’s the Future

It’s not just these guys in suits who react this way when they learn about Twitter and Facebook… Most of the university administrators around the globe who hear my talks react the same way! =)

Skip Class, Do Better

iTunes University and the classroom: Can podcasts replace Professors?

iTunes University, a website with downloadable educational podcasts, can provide students the opportunity to obtain professors’ lectures when students are unable to attend class. To determine the effectiveness of audio lectures in higher education, undergraduate general psychology students participated in one of two conditions. In the lecture condition, participants listened to a 25-min lecture given in person by a professor using PowerPoint slides. Copies of the slides were given to aid note-taking. In the podcast condition, participants received a podcast of the same lecture along with the PowerPoint handouts. Participants in both conditions were instructed to keep a running log of study time and activities used in preparing for an exam. One week from the initial session students returned to take an exam on lecture content. Results indicated that students in the podcast condition who took notes while listening to the podcast scored significantly higher than the lecture condition. The impact of mobile learning on classroom performance is discussed.

If you don’t have access to Computers & Education Volume 52, Issue 3, April 2009, Pages 617-623, see the writeups in New Scientist and the New York Times.

Obviously we need replication studies. But it begs the question – if this finding were to be relatively stable, would higher education pay attention, or ignore its own research?

The First Rule of Government Spending

(Note: This is a draft of my upcoming BackBurner column in Tech Trends. I’d appreciate your comments.)

In the 1997 film adaptation of Carl Sagan’s Contact, S. R. Hadden teaches Ellie Arroway “the first rule of government spending: why have one when you can have two for twice the price?”

If only! When it comes to curriculum materials like textbooks, practice exercises, test item banks, instructional videos, and online simulations, our government and school districts are more than happy to pay for them again, and again, and a hundred thousand times again, year after year.

This made sense in the days before the advent of the Internet, when students had to compete for access to educational materials. In those days, if Johnny was using the calculator, Jenny had to wait her turn; if Mary was reading the science book, Mark had to wait his turn. Schools needed to purchase a calculator and a science book for each child in school if they wanted each child to have ready access to these resources.

Since the advent of the Internet, the competitive nature of educational materials has disappeared. While Susie is running calculations in the online chemistry laboratory, another million students are using it too; while Johnny is exploring genetics in the online simulator, another million students are too. It’s just like when you read the news on CNN.com while a million other people do, too.

An online educational resource is different from a physical educational resource because every student in the state of Utah can use the same online resource at the same time. We don’t need to buy a copy for every student in the state – one copy is enough for everyone! Yet despite this fact, schools in the state still enter into contracts with commercial online curriculum providers that require them to pay for a “copy” for each and every student. What a waste!

But it gets worse. In the past we took some solace after paying the huge bill for all those calculators and textbooks in knowing that, once we paid for them, third graders could use them for many years to come. Unfortunately for our schools, commercial online curriculum providers don’t sell online curriculum materials to schools – they rent them to schools, generally on a one-year contract. This means that in addition to paying for tens of thousands of copies when only one copy would suffice, we pay for permission to use each of these copies again next year, and pay for them all again the next year, and then again the next…

These commercial online curriculum licenses are perhaps the single biggest waste of taxpayer dollars in all of government spending, and that’s really saying something. Our schools pay for tens of thousands of copies, and pay for them again and again, year after year, when simply producing one copy the state owned would suffice.

Commercial online curriculum providers understand the new economics of creating and distributing digital content via the Internet – that you can create one copy and sell access to it millions of times with no reproduction, warehousing, or shipping costs. These commercial providers take lucrative advantage of the fact that our state governments and school districts do not understand these new economics. And it’s their prerogative to continue to pillage the villagers as long as we remain ignorant.

Rather than remain in the dark about the new economics, our governments and school districts should do their homework for a change, wise up, and use taxpayer dollars to create a collection of online educational resources that the state can pay for once and then own and reuse indefinitely. Understanding and leveraging these new economics to the states’ and school districts’ advantage will save our cash-starved education systems a significant amount of money that can be redirected into teacher salaries or other worthy areas.

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) provide an excellent model. Some years ago they recognized that because taxpayers pay for the research they fund, the results of that research should be freely available to the public. Under the old paradigm, taxpayer money went to NIH, which funded research, which was then published in copyrighted journals, which universities and others had to pay to read. So taxpayers actually paid for this research many times over – once to fund it, and then again and again for every public education institution in their state who subscribed to the journals. And the public still had no access to those research results (since the vast majority of the public are not affiliated with a university).

Rather than continue to waste taxpayer dollars so egregiously, paying for research several times over, the NIH Public Access Policy (which became official in April 2008, also known as the “NIH mandate”) now states that each and every one of the final, peer-reviewed journal manuscripts reporting NIH funded research must be placed in a publicly accessible (free) digital archive (see http://publicaccess.nih.gov/). As a consequence, taxpayers no longer pay multiple times over for access to the results of research they funded in the first place.

Education should take the same path. Any and all curriculum materials whose development is funded with taxpayer dollars should be freely and openly available to the public. We paid for them, they belong to us, and it is nothing short of stupid for a state government or school district to pay for them a second, third, or 500,000th time.

Famous Preacher Will Go to Prison?

In yesterday’s Wall Street Journal article New Kindle Audio Feature Causes a Stir Fowler and Trachtenberg reported an incredible claim from the ED of the Authors Guild:

“They don’t have the right to read a book out loud,” said Paul Aiken, executive director of the Authors Guild. “That’s an audio right, which is derivative under copyright law.”

Hot on the heals of (and perhaps influenced by) this announcement now comes word that Zondervan, publisher of the popular New International Version of the Bible, is suing Saddleback Church pastor Rick Warren for copyright infringement.

“He reads passage after passage from the book every week, verbatim,” said a source at Zondervan speaking on condition of anonymity. “This is clearly a public performance of our copyrighted work, and this public performance is done for pay, week in and week out. Mr. Warren is building himself quite the little financial empire atop our intellectual property, and we want a piece of the action.”

Word of the lawsuit has sent shockwaves through the megachurch community. Sects which rely on the public domain King James Version were reportedly disappointed but smug.

In equally fabricated news, Random House has notified my oldest daughter that a court date has been set for April 11 in Random House versus Wiley, regarding an incident in which she read aloud The Cat in the Hat, Go Dog, Go!, and Are You My Mother? to our youngest son in the front yard in late autumn 2008. Even though she’s not yet 10, I must admit to being keenly disappointed in her failure to understand my repeated lectures about what constitutes a public performance. As an expression of my dissatisfaction, I’ve told her she’s on her own at the trial.