<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: START-ing to think about user-contributed metadata</title>
	<atom:link href="http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/331/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/331</link>
	<description>pragmatism over zeal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 11:49:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Kraus</title>
		<link>http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/331/comment-page-1#comment-34617</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Kraus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 01:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/331#comment-34617</guid>
		<description>As I read back through the original post referenced, I was really interested in the designated progression of the metadata and the terms &quot;increasing engagement.&quot;  Is this something that tracks well with our frameworks for instructional design?  Should we be trying to increase user metadata as part of the instructional experience?  Interesting.  Thanks for the post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I read back through the original post referenced, I was really interested in the designated progression of the metadata and the terms &#8220;increasing engagement.&#8221;  Is this something that tracks well with our frameworks for instructional design?  Should we be trying to increase user metadata as part of the instructional experience?  Interesting.  Thanks for the post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

