<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: About the Open Publication License</title>
	<atom:link href="http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/329/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/329</link>
	<description>pragmatism over zeal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 06:59:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: i, quaid &#8250; Why relicense Fedora documentation and wiki content</title>
		<link>http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/329/comment-page-1#comment-43843</link>
		<dc:creator>i, quaid &#8250; Why relicense Fedora documentation and wiki content</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 03:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/329#comment-43843</guid>
		<description>[...] the OPL (Open Publications License) 1.0.  The author and once-and-only-ever maintainer of the OPL wrote two years ago why people should stop using his license in favor of the CC licenses.  Please read that, it is well reasoned and makes compelling arguments, even more so because it is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the OPL (Open Publications License) 1.0.  The author and once-and-only-ever maintainer of the OPL wrote two years ago why people should stop using his license in favor of the CC licenses.  Please read that, it is well reasoned and makes compelling arguments, even more so because it is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sobre la Open Publication License &#171; enramos</title>
		<link>http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/329/comment-page-1#comment-42783</link>
		<dc:creator>Sobre la Open Publication License &#171; enramos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 09:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/329#comment-42783</guid>
		<description>[...] [1]~$ About the Open Publication License [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [1]~$ About the Open Publication License [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Open Content Discussions &#171; Foreseeing Linux</title>
		<link>http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/329/comment-page-1#comment-34577</link>
		<dc:creator>Open Content Discussions &#171; Foreseeing Linux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 00:18:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/329#comment-34577</guid>
		<description>[...] facts on this topic are and now were made clearer by David Wileys blog post (the primary creator of the OPL) . Quote: &#8220;Anyone interested in a license like this is far [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] facts on this topic are and now were made clearer by David Wileys blog post (the primary creator of the OPL) . Quote: &#8220;Anyone interested in a license like this is far [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.140 seconds -->
