Comments on: Why I Love OCW http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/314 pragmatism over zeal Wed, 17 Mar 2010 06:59:35 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: OLDaily[中文版] » Blog Archive » 2007å¹´3月13æ—¥ http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/314/comment-page-1#comment-34063 OLDaily[中文版] » Blog Archive » 2007å¹´3月13æ—¥ Wed, 14 Mar 2007 13:11:41 +0000 http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/314#comment-34063 [...] 尽管对知识共享许å?¯å??议中放弃é?žå•†ä¸šæ?¡æ¬¾çš„争论（想想å‰?一段在CC自己对æ?¡æ¬¾è§£é‡Šï¼Œå’ŒMIT对æ?¡æ¬¾è§£è¯»ä¹‹é—´å?‘生的分歧），ä»?å°†æŒ?续进行下去，你还是会喜欢David Wiley所æ??è¿°å¼€æº?è¿?动未æ?¥çš„历å?²ã€‚我支æŒ?é?žå•†ä¸šæ?¡æ¬¾ï¼Œç”¨çš„是我自己ä¸?那么技术性的表述（如果你在用它挣钱，它就是商业性的，如果你ä¸?å¾—ä¸?去问使用是å?¦æ˜¯å•†ä¸šæ€§çš„，它就是商业性的）。Wileyä¸?å¾—ä¸?紧接ç?€å†™äº†ä¸€ä¸ªå¸–å­?，为MIT OCW辩护。å?³ä½¿æ²¡æœ‰è¿™ä¸ªè¡¥å……辩护，我也ä¸?会怀疑他对开æº?课程或者是MITå¼€æº?项目的支æŒ?。由于Wiley自己对开æº?课程未æ?¥çš„热情无法在CNN上æŒ?续介ç»?15分钟以上，我们应该了解，还有其他一些更加有æ„?义的标准存在，并且Wiley自己的工作，就åƒ?那些在MIT项目上所å?šè¿‡çš„一样，很é‡?è¦?。毕竟，ä¸?是打开钱包的程度，而是你付出了多少心æ€?，决定了你对一件事的支æŒ?程度。我担ä¿?，Wiley会是第一个对此表示赞å?Œçš„人。David Wiley, iterating toward openness March 13, 2007 [原文链接] [与Stephen讨论] [...] [...] 尽管对知识共享许å?¯å??议中放弃é?žå•†ä¸šæ?¡æ¬¾çš„争论（想想å‰?一段在CC自己对æ?¡æ¬¾è§£é‡Šï¼Œå’ŒMIT对æ?¡æ¬¾è§£è¯»ä¹‹é—´å?‘生的分歧），ä»?å°†æŒ?续进行下去，你还是会喜欢David Wiley所æ??è¿°å¼€æº?è¿?动未æ?¥çš„历å?²ã€‚我支æŒ?é?žå•†ä¸šæ?¡æ¬¾ï¼Œç”¨çš„是我自己ä¸?那么技术性的表述（如果你在用它挣钱，它就是商业性的，如果你ä¸?å¾—ä¸?去问使用是å?¦æ˜¯å•†ä¸šæ€§çš„，它就是商业性的）。Wileyä¸?å¾—ä¸?紧接ç?€å†™äº†ä¸€ä¸ªå¸–å­?，为MIT OCW辩护。å?³ä½¿æ²¡æœ‰è¿™ä¸ªè¡¥å……辩护，我也ä¸?会怀疑他对开æº?课程或者是MITå¼€æº?项目的支æŒ?。由于Wiley自己对开æº?课程未æ?¥çš„热情无法在CNN上æŒ?续介ç»?15分钟以上，我们应该了解，还有其他一些更加有æ„?义的标准存在，并且Wiley自己的工作，就åƒ?那些在MIT项目上所å?šè¿‡çš„一样，很é‡?è¦?。毕竟，ä¸?是打开钱包的程度，而是你付出了多少心æ€?，决定了你对一件事的支æŒ?程度。我担ä¿?，Wiley会是第一个对此表示赞å?Œçš„人。David Wiley, iterating toward openness March 13, 2007 [原文链接] [与Stephen讨论] [...]

]]> By: Brendan Barrett http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/314/comment-page-1#comment-34056 Brendan Barrett Wed, 14 Mar 2007 07:15:15 +0000 http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/314#comment-34056 Hi David, Totally agree with you about the positive influence that MIT has had on the opencourseware/open educational resources and open content movement. However, this movement has been influenced by so many great people and institutions. I would put the your work on open content up there as well as the efforts of USU. Afterall, here at the UNU we are using educommons! Also I have the feeling that all this would not have been possible or even so much fun without Creative Commons! I think that the world of OCW is going to get even more exciting over the next few years as we move from publishing to interacting around and with the content as Web 2.0 matures or Web 3.0 emerges. But to me, a MetaU sounds a bit monolithic. Rather than a MetaU, my boss here at the United Nations University, Hans van Ginkel, talks about transforming the Web/Internet into a Global Learning Space. What we really need, I think, is some way to harness the power of the web so that you can learn in a culturally diverse and enriched world. Maybe that sounds overly idealistic? Hi David,

Totally agree with you about the positive influence that MIT has had on the opencourseware/open educational resources and open content movement.

However, this movement has been influenced by so many great people and institutions. I would put the your work on open content up there as well as the efforts of USU. Afterall, here at the UNU we are using educommons!

Also I have the feeling that all this would not have been possible or even so much fun without Creative Commons!

I think that the world of OCW is going to get even more exciting over the next few years as we move from publishing to interacting around and with the content as Web 2.0 matures or Web 3.0 emerges.

But to me, a MetaU sounds a bit monolithic. Rather than a MetaU, my boss here at the United Nations University, Hans van Ginkel, talks about transforming the Web/Internet into a Global Learning Space. What we really need, I think, is some way to harness the power of the web so that you can learn in a culturally diverse and enriched world. Maybe that sounds overly idealistic?

]]> By: Krista Simons http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/314/comment-page-1#comment-34055 Krista Simons Wed, 14 Mar 2007 03:05:55 +0000 http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/314#comment-34055 Dave: For a timely blurb, check this out: http://chronicle.com/wiredcampus/article/1929/the-songwriter-as-policy-wonk OH - and will we meet up @ AERA? Dave:
For a timely blurb, check this out:

http://chronicle.com/wiredcampus/article/1929/the-songwriter-as-policy-wonk

OH – and will we meet up @ AERA?

]]> By: WouterVH http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/314/comment-page-1#comment-34054 WouterVH Tue, 13 Mar 2007 20:28:56 +0000 http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/314#comment-34054 "If you’d like to nominate another person, another project, or any other anything that you think has had a bigger impact on open education in the last ten years I would love to hear it." Wikipedia. Not one day goes by without using it. For the next 10 years OLPC will be a big contender. “If you’d like to nominate another person, another project, or any other anything that you think has had a bigger impact on open education in the last ten years I would love to hear it.”

Wikipedia.
Not one day goes by without using it.

For the next 10 years OLPC will be a big contender.

]]> By: David Wiley’s Take on the Future at The Fish Wrapper http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/314/comment-page-1#comment-34049 David Wiley’s Take on the Future at The Fish Wrapper Tue, 13 Mar 2007 14:05:16 +0000 http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/314#comment-34049 [...] there’s been some confusion as folks have misinterpreted his point. For a follow-up, read his post clarifying this issue of where he stands on [...] [...] there’s been some confusion as folks have misinterpreted his point. For a follow-up, read his post clarifying this issue of where he stands on [...]

]]>