<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Update on MIT OCW Finances &#8211; and Click to Enroll!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/1180/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/1180</link>
	<description>pragmatism over zeal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 23:17:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weekend Reading: Isn&#8217;t this over yet edition?</title>
		<link>http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/1180/comment-page-1#comment-44718</link>
		<dc:creator>Weekend Reading: Isn&#8217;t this over yet edition?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 01:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opencontent.org/blog/?p=1180#comment-44718</guid>
		<description>[...] David Wiley takes a look at the sustainability of MIT&#8217;s Open CourseWare [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] David Wiley takes a look at the sustainability of MIT&#8217;s Open CourseWare [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Bush</title>
		<link>http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/1180/comment-page-1#comment-44715</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Bush</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 23:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opencontent.org/blog/?p=1180#comment-44715</guid>
		<description>Theoretically, the &quot;best of breed&quot; anything should be able to make its way to the top of the crowd. &quot;Whoever&quot; builds the best &quot;whatever&quot; should have a shot at getting their stuff noticed!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Theoretically, the &#8220;best of breed&#8221; anything should be able to make its way to the top of the crowd. &#8220;Whoever&#8221; builds the best &#8220;whatever&#8221; should have a shot at getting their stuff noticed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Carson</title>
		<link>http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/1180/comment-page-1#comment-44704</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Carson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 03:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opencontent.org/blog/?p=1180#comment-44704</guid>
		<description>College of Eastern Utah can sleep well, Marion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>College of Eastern Utah can sleep well, Marion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Carson</title>
		<link>http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/1180/comment-page-1#comment-44703</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Carson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 03:19:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opencontent.org/blog/?p=1180#comment-44703</guid>
		<description>It is true that certificates and distance learning are on the list of ideas to be examined, but it would be premature to infer MIT is moving in that direction. More that we&#039;re taking a careful look at all the options on the table.

I&#039;m a little unclear on why the focus on distance learning courses as *THE* answer to OCW sustainability. Distance learning is a wickedly tricky thing to do well and make money at, and would take a long time to ramp up. There are plenty of examples of distance learning being unable to support itself , much less another program (http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2009/12/09/u21). My expectation is that in the near term other opportunities will be explored for generating the needed revenue.

Side note:  The staff and production reductions you mention were a planned part of the program as we transitioned in 2007 from the &quot;build phase&quot; that got us to 1,800 courses to the current &quot;enhancement&quot; phase, in which we are updating courses, adding some new ones, and developing new features and ideas.  It wasn&#039;t a response to a financial issue, except to the extent that we were trimming the sails for ongoing operation as opposed to start-up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is true that certificates and distance learning are on the list of ideas to be examined, but it would be premature to infer MIT is moving in that direction. More that we&#8217;re taking a careful look at all the options on the table.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a little unclear on why the focus on distance learning courses as *THE* answer to OCW sustainability. Distance learning is a wickedly tricky thing to do well and make money at, and would take a long time to ramp up. There are plenty of examples of distance learning being unable to support itself , much less another program (<a href="http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2009/12/09/u21" rel="nofollow">http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2009/12/09/u21</a>). My expectation is that in the near term other opportunities will be explored for generating the needed revenue.</p>
<p>Side note:  The staff and production reductions you mention were a planned part of the program as we transitioned in 2007 from the &#8220;build phase&#8221; that got us to 1,800 courses to the current &#8220;enhancement&#8221; phase, in which we are updating courses, adding some new ones, and developing new features and ideas.  It wasn&#8217;t a response to a financial issue, except to the extent that we were trimming the sails for ongoing operation as opposed to start-up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marion Jensen</title>
		<link>http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/1180/comment-page-1#comment-44702</link>
		<dc:creator>Marion Jensen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 03:16:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opencontent.org/blog/?p=1180#comment-44702</guid>
		<description>Ever the pessimist, I&#039;ll pose the obvious question. If MIT does a click to enroll model, and the price is roughly the same of say, the College of Eastern Utah, then will moving to this model by MIT spell the death of OCWs at every other institution? 

If I want to buy songs online, I really only have a few choices. If I want to rent DVDs online, I only have a few choices. Will we see a few big name schools, in different price ranges, dominate the OCW &#039;market&#039;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ever the pessimist, I&#8217;ll pose the obvious question. If MIT does a click to enroll model, and the price is roughly the same of say, the College of Eastern Utah, then will moving to this model by MIT spell the death of OCWs at every other institution? </p>
<p>If I want to buy songs online, I really only have a few choices. If I want to rent DVDs online, I only have a few choices. Will we see a few big name schools, in different price ranges, dominate the OCW &#8216;market&#8217;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

